step 1. But really, within the genealogy and family history, all of us knowthat for every rule there clearly was a different. A good vexing section ofgenealogy is that no one extremely understands how to make use of brand new exceptions orrules that have people decisive adjective for example always, maybe, most likely,likely, etc. It will be interesting when the indeed there other examples ofjointures becoming made annually or a couple of immediately following a well-known marriage go out.
2. Could there be an extant dispensation on relationships out of ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who were 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise last cousins, immediately following removed from the latest fifth LordClifford? Who narrow down its matrimony time.
Arthur
Presumably, in the event that a beneficial dispensation is actually needed and provided, it might havebeen because of the one of several following, and may even can be found in the brand new correspondingregister publication, whether or not it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop away from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. If the 10th Lord Clifford do wed in early 1487 [say January] andhas Age later in that seasons, do brand new chronology maybe not performs?
John hands?
Elizabeth produced in later 1487, Henry born within the 1488/9, Joan when you look at the ,etc. filling in the new names of one’s send from . If (a) thechronology however work; and you may (b) their particular wedding portion was not low; thenwe simply have new 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s that is inside the oppositionto the fresh supposition that she try a legitimate child.
six. Regarding your 1505 pedigree: Are definitely the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII relations omitted? Were there someone else? Therefore,wouldn’t you to echo defectively on this subject file since a resource?
Out of evaluations I’ve created from the new c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith new 1480-1500 Visitation of the North pedigrees, being
Throughout the c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, the brand new Clifford children are maybe not listedin a Clifford pedigree, but alternatively regarding St. John pedigree. Once the I’mnot familiar with the new St. John members of the family, following ‘s the advice asit seems about c.1505 pedigree, given that taken from the latest 1834 Coll. Ideal. etGen. blog post. The phrasing inside the quotations is strictly because it appears inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”Out of my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset got about three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Woman the fresh new King’s Mommy.” that has “The King.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest husband.” she got step 3 daus & dos sons:
A good. “Edith, married so you’re able to Geoffrey Pole out-of Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married to the Lady Margaret, dau. regarding theDuke away from Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded to help you Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[another child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d five pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” that has “Five daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, married to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. out of Lincolnshire.”B4. “Good Nun off Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded to https://lovingwomen.org/sv/kambodjanska-kvinnor/ help you Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you may sistren.” With issueindicated, not titled.C2. “E, wedded to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, married very first to the Lord Zouche; immediately after to the LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated but not titled.
Margaret Duchess away from Somerset, by the “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”
